I remember taking Calculus in university, didn"t examine a lot and still taken what was going on and did really well on the final exam worth a ton of marks. That very same year, I took a Economics Macro (one of the prerequisites for the CPA) and I failed it. I didn"t even have a clue what was going on in that course. Also took Firm Stats and gained a C- in that course!Reference: ... n-program/If you want to be a CPA, you have to execute these modules. Look at Module 3 and 4. That"s Econ and also Stats!Wright here is the "bookkeeping is much easier than so and so" coming from?
Sep 4th, 2014 1:44 pmimingwanMember Dec 2, 2010 418 articles 103 upvotes Prairies

Sep 4th, 2014 1:44 pm

The reality of ending up being a skilled accountant is that between a four-year degree and also then 3-5 years for a designation it takes practically as lengthy as ending up being a doctor. Is it correct? I would certainly tend to think not, however it is what it is. And now that I"ve acquired to the end of my journey to a expert designation, my preference has a tendency to be that they do not make it a lot much easier for others as it could lessen the value of the desigcountry.All that shelp, any kind of university company regime is going to have actually macro business economics as a prerequisite to either gain in or to graduate. If you do not have a mind that"s well suited for knowledge macro economic pressures perhaps business isn"t the finest course for you in life. Then aacquire, perhaps you just had a crappy teacher and also you must take it again.

Accounting is a difficult path to take. It"s astonishing that so many type of human being flock to accountancy after doing a "general" degree.I recognize a couple world who graduated from UBC through a scientific research level. 1 of them was only gaining 50% on the UBC Diploma in Accounting courses and decided to drop out. Anvarious other already failed Intermediate audit...not as soon as, however twice....he is currently re-reasoning around it and also might go to BCIT rather to perform somepoint else. he"s only halfmethod with the DAP
Sep 4th, 2014 2:16 pmSum_guyDeal Addict Apr 7, 2011 1929 posts 443 upvotes Hamilton

Sep fourth, 2014 2:16 pm

Having done both (effectively too!) I honestly think engineering is the harder education and learning to obtain. As an undergrad engineering student you"re looking at taking six classes at any one time with many of those having actually lab requirements. That implies 30 hours or more a week plus homework. During the college year that expected working eexceptionally night and also only taking off Friday nights and also Saturday for "off" nights. In accounting you"re looking at 5 classes through three hours of in class time for the many component. It"s most likely not even more than 18 hours of total course time a week. So ideal off the bat there"s a differential in workload. It was so dramatic that after engineering I essential to obtain a 20 hour a week consulting task bereason I was going stir crazy while doing an MBA - I was simply simple bored.The flip side is that to acquire right into a huge 4 accounting firm you have to have actually the GPA - that"s not as important (YMMV) in engineering where your 4th year task could be the differentiator.In the finish though what defines "difficult"? In terms of outideal dropout prices it"s likely neither of these 2. It additionally depends on the perkid - I would never have been embraced into nor made it through design or industrial style. Getting into an debate over who"s smarter is foolish - concentrate on doing something you can like and obtain passist for.

You watching: Is accounting harder than engineering

I don"t get what is all this confusion about. People are excellent at different things, doesn"t mean that it makes one better or harder than the other. Just bereason tbelow are lot of people flocking over to bookkeeping, doesn"t make it straightforward. Most human being who go right into bookkeeping occupational enattempt or tool level tasks. Only a pick few will certainly move on to senior/executive roles. If you found business economics hard, some human being might find it basic. Maybe you"re really great at math however many people find math hard however they may be better than you at economics. Engineering requires a perboy that is good at math, physics and such however medicine calls for someone to be good at chemistry and biology. I don"t think you can compare the 2.

See more: Control Systems Engineering 7Th Edition Nise Pdf, Control Systems Engineering, 7Th Edition

Sep 4th, 2014 2:20 pmMars2012Moderator May 28, 2012 11387 articles 3611 upvotes Saskatoon

Sep 4th, 2014 2:20 pm

Sep 4th, 2014 2:24 pmimingwanMember Dec 2, 2010 418 write-ups 103 upvotes Prairies

Sep 4th, 2014 2:24 pm

I think world flock to it bereason tbelow are tangible job methods which tfinish to pay sensibly well. If you graduate with a "general" level there might not be an obvious course to gainful employment. When you enroll in an accountancy regimen, you can have the ability to start working in an entry-level accountancy place (Accounting Payable Clerk for example) fairly shortly after founding.
Different people are better at different points, some people flourish in the highly structured design programs wright here everything is booked out for you while other fail miserably at the self study compelled in an audit routine.Other then that one more point to think about is that your marks should be much higher in an accounting program then in an engineering regimen. If you drop listed below the 70% average in your 51 crmodify hrs for accountancy you can"t acquire a desigcountry and it pretty much provides the level useless. Engineering on the various other hand you deserve to float by via 50s and still gain an design level that"s worth something.